Ethics and Morality of the Death Penalty | Personal View

Morals and Morality of the Death Penalty | Personal View Capital punishment is an indecent and ineffectual approach. In this paper I will show that capital punishment is insufficient and corrupt. I will demonstrate that it is incapable by indicating that it has been forced on honest individuals, targets racial minorities, and doesn't prevent wrongdoing. What's more, I will demonstrate that it is an unethical practice. Capital punishment has been forced on guiltless individuals before. Scientists James Liebman and Jeffry Fagan inspected capital punishment cases in a timespan of twenty-two years and found that the greater part of the cases were not directed accurately, and that huge numbers of the respondents were honest. Of the eighty-two percent of litigants with death penalties that were upset by state investigative courts7% were seen as guiltless of the capital wrongdoing charged (Schmalleger). The guiltlessness of a portion of the respondents indicted for a capital wrongdoing demonstrates the uncertainty of the juries which sentenced them. Juries force their racial partialities when seeing a respondent as liable or blameless. This is obvious in the proportion of African Americans and Caucasian Americans in the populace, contrasted with the apportion of them indicted with capital punishment. African Americans make out of twelve percent of the number of inhabitants in the United States, and they make out of forty-two percent of the quantity of current individuals waiting for capital punishment. Also, in pretty much every capital punishment [of a dark person], the race of the casualty is white, though [since 1972] only one [death penalty] has included a white litigant for the homicide of an individual of color (Schmalleger). These measurements plainly demonstrate that juries force their racial biases on respondents. Crime percentages don't deflect in states with capital punishment. Numerous capital punishment defenders guarantee that the inconvenience of capital punishment stops individuals from carrying out rough wrongdoings. In any case, contemplates have indicated that crimes in certain states with capital punishment are, amazingly, higher than those without it. In addition, it is additionally a money related weight to force capital punishment on individuals. It costs more to force capital punishment on somebody than it does to restrict them to jail forever. The idea of capital punishment is shameless in itself, for it restores a wrong for a wrong. The misleading quality or wickedness of an activity isn't influenced when forced on somebody who submitted a wrong previously. This is on the grounds that the misleading quality of an activity exists inside the activity itself, and not the conditions in which the activity is submitted. The explanation that the state gets included when somebody does a type of wrong is on the grounds that that wrong has some way or another upset the request for society. Furthermore, individuals are imprisoned or detained to keep them from further upsetting the request for society. Be that as it may, restoring an inappropriate (for example capital punishment) doesn't fix the request that existed before the main wrong, yet just upsets it more. This is on the grounds that retaliation (for example forcing capital punishment on somebody who killed somebody) is certainly not a decent and on the off chance that it were the situation that it is a decent, at that point somebody ought to have the option to order vengeance on somebody who wronged them previously. For instance, on the off chance that it were the situation that reprisal is acceptable, at that point a man ought to have the option to take from a cheat who took from him in any case. Another model is somebody assaulting a person who assaulted them preceding the principal episode. These two models obviously show that it is clearly false that requital is acceptable. In this manner, capital punishment isn't advantageous to society, and it is likewise improper. In this paper I have demonstrated that capital punishment is both insufficient and unethical. It is insufficient in that it doesn't dissuade wrongdoing, it is forced on honest individuals, and targets racial minorities. It is corrupt on the grounds that it restores a wrong for a wrong, and a wrong is rarely right, clearly. Consequently, capital punishment is an indecent and ineffectual practice. Reference:Â Schmalleger, Frank. Criminology. second. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2011.

Sartre’s Criticisms on Human Essence in the Light of Aristotle’s Philosophy

Our capacity to take part in deliberation is, obviously, a one of a kind blessing enriched to our human perception. What's more, the purpose behind such an advising conflict is close to acting naturally clear: I. e. , just human people can see through in any case particular and separate elements, a bringing together idea that uncovers these things’ basic nature, if not their characterizing embodiment. To this end, it is important to point that our human intellect’s dominance to abstracting the forces is another feature of human discernment. This is on the grounds that knowing, much the same as observing, manages us a quick handle of reality’s nature and reason; for by the insignificant experience of something, state a table, we right away outfit ourselves with a working idea about the thing’s substance †I. e. , we ‘know’ what a table is, what is it for. In this way, it bodes well to state that abstracting forces structure an integral part of both the natural and inductive procedure of a person’s capacity to know reality. Our comprehension of the idea of quintessence draws predominantly from the plan gave by the Greek transcendentalism. Also, in this it would keen to submit general direction to Aristotle’s ‘hylemorphic’ system. As indicated by Aristotle, anything that exists †state, a tree or a canine †is established of both a presence and a pith; I. e. , everything both have material and formal constitutions. From one viewpoint, presence relates to the demonstration of being, or the facticity of a thing. For instance, that table is being genuine right when one sees it. Then again, embodiment relates to the idea of a specific thing. It is what makes a thing to be what it is; a disconnected idea which makes us see the association between the substances that we are seeing (state, a table) and different things (state, a homeroom loaded up with tables) having a place with a similar sort or animal categories (Lavine 71). Quintessence in this manner characterizes the idea of a specific thing or depicts the viewpoint appropriate to the equivalent. On the off chance that we continue with this line of argumentation, we can proceed to guarantee that one can apply the idea of substance to relate to truth of human people. From here, we can move to recognize prominent viewpoints which might be esteemed ‘proper to human persons’, to gather what we may call â€Å"human essence† †I. e. , that an individual is a current being, that he shows trademark components legitimate to creatures, yet that he have a personnel of acumen and freewill appropriate to him and only him. In a definitive examination, one can say that the quintessence characterizing a human individual lies in encircling him as a living animal that shares certain trademark qualities of creatures, yet is blessed all things considered with the exceptional personnel of keenness and freewill. Key to this procedure, it must be contended, is portraying the determinate parts of his very presence. Undoubtedly, we may in any case recognize a decent number of trademark components that could similarly portray being human individual. Furthermore, without a doubt, we can't stop at understanding crucial animality and judiciousness as perspectives that adequately catch the â€Å"whatness† of humankind; for the contemplated development of human embodiments doesn't involve that we have totally encompassed the all out truth of human people. That having stated, Jean Paul Sartre accepts that mankind has no fixed substance. At the end of the day, he accepts that mankind can't be surrounded inside the parameters of determinateness or the cutoff points we force by translating human substances. At any rate, Sartre battles that we can't characterize the shapes of being an individual in light of the fact that our opportunity decides the one of a kind way of our very presence. J. Sartre’s dispute generally draws from his idea of total human opportunity. A scholar who has a place with the past gathering of rationalists known as Existentialists, Sartre’s reasoning puts higher premium than most on acknowledging human presence as a solid and ceaseless making progress toward one’s own turning out to be (Marias 436). This implies, for Sartre, we as human people should continually value the reality we exist, more than the way that we have an embodiment to outline our ensuing courses of activities. Sartre accepts that â€Å"we are essentially free†, and that the weight of â€Å"making† our own human substance lies in the decisions that we make (Marias 440). Put in layman’s terms, Sartre accepts that our opportunity is total, and that, considerably more critically, the decisions we make decide the sort of individual that we are. As it were, Sartre switches the rationale of human embodiment †I. e. , human activities doesn't spill out of one’s own pith; rather, human substance is shaped by the activities that we as people focus on doing. For such explanation, and as referenced prior, Sartre accepts that mankind has no fixed embodiment. What's more, to the extent that the solid type of our human pith takes signal just from the exercises which human people do, Sartre trusts the evidence speak for itself on the plain suspicion that one’s life can't be set inside any confining ideas of embodiment, in any way, shape or form (Marias 440-441). There are motivations to think, be that as it may, that Sartre may have surrounded human opportunity profoundly and that his discount disavowal of a recognizable human quintessence may have been taken definitely. To this end, strains of Aristotle’s theory might be useful in revealing insight into a portion of the oversights Sartre may have submitted in preventing the legitimacy from claiming human embodiment by virtue of outright opportunity. Right off the bat, it might be clever to be helped to remember the way that Aristotle comprehends human quintessence as a part of life that doesn't viably confine human ability to decide one’s way as indicated by the arrangements of activities an individual may enthusiastically choose. Human embodiment simply discusses the sort or nature of presence which is construable from and recognizable in a specific thing (Lavine 71). It only serves to help man acknowledge what sort of animal he is by method of classes and definitions. On the other hand, the idea of human embodiment doesn't, in any at all, infer an outright assurance of human reality as per these arrangement of order or classification. A model may help further arrange the problem: when somebody considers man basically an otherworldly being †I. e. , the limit with respect to profound relations with God has a place appropriately with the trademark quality of mankind †one doesn't preclude the chance of not having confidence in God all together. Rather, one only says something about the humanity’s general dominance to venerating a divinity, despite individual decision to contradict. The equivalent goes valid for human embodiment. Sartre feels that mankind has not a fixed quintessence by virtue of a human opportunity that decides a subsequent human instinct. Lamentably for Sartre, human substance and human opportunity are not fundamentally unrelated. Truth be told, a person’s opportunity is possibly certified, if not emphasizd by the way that the human substance is characterized by an inferred affirmation of man’s of essential soundness and limit with respect to freewill. Besides, Sartre’s conflict that human people have no fixed embodiment is unquestionably hard to contend decisively in light of the fact that human opportunity is truly not total and that humanity’s essential pith doesn't rely upon human decision however on what nature has generally given. Two perspectives become an integral factor with in this specific reply. In any case, Sartre may have taken human opportunity drastically in contending that it our ability to decide ourselves must be taken in outright terms †I. e. , we can do whatever we wish; in addition, we are the ones deciding our subsequent pith all the while. This, tragically, is unsound. For example, in the event that I, conceived as a human individual, were to pick living like a pooch, I would most likely discover certain canine like exercises incongruent with my characteristic real procedures. I would think that its hard to bark, not to mention stroll in a four-legged way; as these are not reliable with how was I brought up. The point in dispute here lies in contending that human opportunity, in spite of Sartre’s contentions, can't be taken as an outright determinant of human instinct. On the opposite one may think that its hard to intentionally go astray from the requests of our fundamental human substance. Such trouble ought to bring us more into an energy about our human instinct not so much as an angle subject to human decision, yet a perspective that is settled on immaculate by the decisions that we make. Thus Aristotle’s teleological way of thinking seems to come to fruition. As indicated by Aristotle, pith goes before activities, or quintessence goes before presence; and that the flawlessness of all activities comes when they satisfy the embodiment being referred to (Marias 74). For example, when an individual uses basic deduction before making a judgment, such a demonstration can be considered as a flawlessness of the man’s nature as a reasonable substance. The point in conflict here lies in contending that we can't generally get rid of human instinct. Despite what might be expected, our activities must run predictable with it; for just when we act as indicated by our tendency can our activities be culminated by our pith. By method of end, I wish to end with an idea that excuses Sartre’s conflict †I. . , that mankind can't locate a typical embodiment legitimate to himself and himself alone †by virtue of its patent powerlessness to consider the genuine condition of human issues. In the conversations that were created, it was found out that Sartre’s invalidation of human pith originates from his conviction that human opportunity is supreme, and that human people are the ones trim their individual substances. In any case, there a re most likely valid justifications to believe that this philosophical positions doesn't hold water. In the first place, it

How to Essay Samples For Fourth Grade

<h1>How to Essay Samples For Fourth Grade</h1><p>Are you searching for methods of how to article tests for fourth grade? Here are a few thoughts that may help you.</p><p></p><p>The most clear method of how to exposition tests for fourth grade is to attempt your karma with a paper that will be in the subject region of your evaluation. These papers can be extreme as they are quite often composed by an instructor and they will utilize the entirety of the structure and models that they have given you.</p><p></p><p>This makes composing a model exposition genuinely simple for you. Truth be told, it is likewise prudent to incorporate some model article models as you experience the procedure to guarantee that you comprehend them thoroughly.</p><p></p><p>If you are planning to compose a paper on recent developments or policy driven issues, fourth grade is the best an ideal opportunity to find out about t hese subjects. You can go to the papers, magazines and TV for instances of how to compose great political commentary.</p><p></p><p>Will this give you any thoughts? Not so much, however you may find that you have a few thoughts that can be utilized to illuminate your composition. What preferable approach to find this over to bring a look into the universe of recent developments to perceive what's going on the planet today.</p><p></p><p>You will likely have seen that on the off chance that you needed to compose an article for an earlier year, you could generally get it out of the prospectus, however when you need to do as such for the next year, it is somewhat harder. Thus, you might need to think about composing something yourself. All things considered, it is your paper, so why not compose it by hand?</p><p></p><p>Famous journalists have been known to turn in their own articles, which demonstrates that it is con ceivable to keep in touch with them yourself. The most effective method to compose a paper is significant and there is no point of figuring out how to create articles by investigating on the web. In the event that you need to figure out how to compose a paper, you should start by finding a writer who composes well and read their work.</p><p></p><p>Once you have a genuine case of what they are doing, it will make the procedure much simpler for you. This will likewise permit you to discover what composing style and perspective they are taking when they compose. When you know these things, it will be simpler to compose your own paper and you won't need to stress over how to exposition tests for fourth grade.</p>

College Sexual Assault Essay - What You Should Know About Writing One

<h1>College Sexual Assault Essay - What You Should Know About Writing One</h1><p>A school rape exposition isn't as simple as it might sound, yet with some exertion, you can think of an extraordinary one. Nobody needs to be in the circumstance where they are attacked and what they state will make their experience much additionally terrifying and difficult to deal with. At the point when this occurs, individuals regularly endure peacefully. It very well may be difficult to tell somebody, or maybe just yourself, that you were contacted in a sexual path without your consent.</p><p></p><p>The most ideal approach to move beyond this trouble is to expound on what occurred, and this doesn't really mean expounding on the rape itself. Rather, you ought to expound on what you were feeling at that point and what was experiencing your brain at that point. This can assist you with managing the injury of the occasion and permit you to proceed onward with yo ur life, but a somewhat less glad one.</p><p></p><p>However, the contrast between composing an exposition about the rape itself and expounding on the impact it has on you and others is that when you expound on the occasion, you will compose from the heart. It is from your heart that you will communicate the entirety of your feelings and musings. With the main kind of paper, you will basically transfer what somebody let you know and keeping in mind that this is viable, you will likewise not have the option to communicate fully.</p><p></p><p>If you choose to expound on your school rape, don't be reluctant to talk openly and don't hesitate to not stress over being viewed as frail, since you are most certainly not. You realize that you are solid and valiant. Your closest companion could never attempt to contact your body with their hands and you ought not need to endure due to something that someone else did.</p><p></p>&l t;p>While you are composing your school rape paper, don't be hesitant to impart the data to other people. Let your instructor, direction advisor, or senior member realize that you are prepared to talk about the issue. Makesure that they comprehend that you need to discuss it with them and that they offer you the chance to examine it. You may not feel great discussing it with them or your folks, however don't let anybody exploit you.</p><p></p><p>When you are composing your school rape exposition, you ought to know that you are expounding on something that you will most likely always remember. Truth be told, in the event that you need any composing help or feel that your exposition needs work, at that point you can generally contact an expert to assist you with it. You ought to ask a composing administration to assist you with chipping away at your article by utilizing an editorial manager, editing it, and reconsidering it until it is totally acceptable. Th e most significant thing for you to recollect is that you ought to be certain about what you are stating and don't let anybody talk down to you or to your sentiments about the matter.</p><p></p><p>There are different ways you can help the way toward composing your school rape exposition, for example, figuring out how to compose a paper and having somebody alter it. You ought to be set up before you compose your paper. You should recognize what your article is going to coverwhat your point is, and what you need your paper to achieve. Compose the exposition gradually and purposely with the goal that it streams easily, and furthermore, attempt to incorporate numerous details.</p><p></p><p>You ought to likewise have a solid conviction that you can expound on your school rape. It is just by having this conviction that you will have the option to defeat the hindrances of composing a paper about something that you can't review how you felt ab out at the time.</p>

How to Figure Out Exactly What to Charge for Your Freelance Work

How to Figure Out Exactly What to Charge for Your Freelance Work Mark and Dan are highly skilled freelance writers. Both of them make $5,000 per month on average. Their skill levels and the quality of their work are at par.Yet, there is a huge difference in their lifestyles.Mark works 60+ hours every week, with his time divided between several clients.He barely gets time to spend with his family. The last vacation he took was three years ago. There is simply no time for such things. He knows he has to sacrifice such luxuries in order earn a decent income.Dan’s lifestyle is the complete opposite of Mark’s. Mark only works 25 hours each week, with his time divided between just two clients.Working only 25 hours a week, he has ample time to spend with his young kids. He even has time to take a one month long vacation every year. Dan is actually living the freelancer’s dream!How is it even possible for two freelance writers with equal skills and equal quality of work to have such different lifestyles?The answer lies in their pricing strategies. M ark believes that freelancing is a competitive industry, and therefore his charges low rates in order to attract more clients. This means that he has to put in a lot of time in his work in order to earn a decent income.Dan, on the other hand, knows the value of his work. Instead of pricing his services competitively, he charges premium rates for his services.With his higher rates, he gets higher quality clients and only has to work a few hours each day to sustain himself and his family.In the last couple of years, freelancing has become an attractive working model, and a huge number of people are ditching full time employment in favor of freelancing.By 2016, 35% of the US workforce were freelancers, with the number set to hit 42% by 2020. Freelancing gives you the freedom to choose your own schedule, be your own boss, and choose the kind of projects you want to work on.Despite its benefits, most professionals who switch to freelancing find themselves with one huge challenge â€" how to price their services.With freelancing, there is no guaranteed monthly income. You can make thousands of dollars one month and make nothing the following month. You are responsible for costs like your health insurance, taxes and licenses.You are also responsible for other costs associated with running your freelance business, such as purchase of equipment and materials, marketing, and so on.All these are factors you need to put into consideration when coming up with your freelance rates, and if you are just starting out, it can all be a bit confusing.Because of this, most new freelancers experience a moment of dread and anxiety when a client asks the following question: “So, how much do you charge for your services?”THE TWO MAJOR PRICING MODELS FOR FREELANCERS As a freelancer, there are two major pricing models that you can use for you services â€" hourly pricing and project based (fixed) pricing.Hourly PricingThis is the most common method for freelancers who are just startin g out, because this model is quite simplistic. With this method, you come up with an hourly rate for your work and then multiply that by the number of hours you will spend doing the work.You can use different methods to come up with your hourly rate.My preferred method for setting an hourly rate is to first decide the amount of money you want to earn in a year and then divide it by the number of billable hours you will spend working.For instance, if you want to earn $60,000 dollars a year, that means you should earn $5,000 each month. If you intend to work for 40 billable hours each week, then you need to charge $125 per hour.In this case, if a client gives you a project that takes you ten hours, you would then charge them $1,250 for the project. A good way of making the hourly pricing model work well for you and the client is to use time tracking software to track the amount of time you spend working on the client’s project.Hourly pricing is a good model you do not know how long the project is going to take you. For instance, if the client is not very sure of the scope of the project, meaning that there will be change of plans and numerous revisions, the hourly pricing keeps you protected.Even if some work is halted midway and has to be redone, you still get paid for the work you put in.Similarly, if you are offering a new service and cannot make an accurate estimate for how long it is going to take you, hourly pricing is the best option for you. This is why most freelancers who are just starting out might prefer using this model.Unfortunately, the hourly pricing model is limiting. As you become more experienced and better at your work, you will generally become more efficient. You start utilizing better tools and systems, you learn a few shortcuts here and there, you learn new tricks, and so on.As a result, you become faster in your work.You start doing in a few hours something that would initially take you a whole day. The quality of your work also improv es. With the hourly pricing model, this becomes a disadvantage for you. Despite becoming more efficient in your work and producing a higher quality of work, you start earning less because you spend less time doing the work.In addition, you need to realize that clients don’t generally pay you for the amount of hours you work. In most cases, clients pay you for the value you provide. They don’t care if something takes you thirty minutes or ten hours, so long as it is done by the time they want it and that it satisfies their needs.By charging an hourly rate, you limit yourself â€" there is only so much you can justify charging per hour.However, by switching to a project based pricing model, you can charge much higher rates, not based on the amount of time spent on the project, but by the value you provide.Most clients won’t have a problem paying higher rates so long as the quality of your work is proportionate to your rates.Project-Based (Fixed) PricingWith this model, the freela ncer charges a fixed rate for the entire project. With this model, instead of basing your fee on the number of hours spent working, your fee is based on the end result that you deliver, which is what the client cares about anyway.This is my preferred pricing model, because with this model, you don’t have to worry about earning less by becoming more efficient. This model allows you to earn more while working less.When coming up with a fixed rate fee for your service, there are two things you need to consider. The first one is the amount of work that needs to be done. It is good not to confuse the amount of work that needs to be done with the time spent doing the work.For example, if you are a web designer, your client might need a website with a number of features. Setting up some of these features might be an automated process that takes you no time, but you should still factor it in your pricing since it is a service that actually needs to be done.In this case, you would be charg ing for your knowledge, not for the time spent doing the work.The second thing you need to consider when setting your fixed rate fee is the actual value you are delivering for the client. To do this, you need to be aware how exactly your service helps your clients.For instance, if you are a freelance copywriter and you know that your copy will help the client bring in $100,000 in sales, it would be very easy to justify a $1000 fee for creating ad copy. By showing clients the potential ROI for your services, you stand at a better position to command higher rates for your services.FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN DETERMINING EXACTLY WHAT TO CHARGE FOR YOUR SERVICESOver the course of my freelancing career, I have come to the conclusion that the best approach when it comes to your freelance rates is to remain flexible. Regardless of the pricing model you opt to work with, you stand to gain more by adjusting your rates to the client and their specific project.It doesn’t make much sense chargin g a huge multinational company the same rates you would charge a one man startup.Similarly, it doesn’t make much sense charging the same rates for an overly creative project that requires specific knowledge as you would charge for a general, straightforward project that can be done by anyone within your industry.In spite of this flexibility, there are a number of factors and criteria you need to keep in mind when coming up with your rates. These include:Your Living And Business ExpensesWhen on full time employment, most of the costs of running the business are taken care of by your employer. Once you decide to freelance, you will have to cater for all these costs and expenses from your pocket.Therefore, you have to put these costs and expenses into consideration when setting a rate for your services. In particular, you need to think about costs such as hosting for your website, subscriptions for any business tools and services you are going to use, internet, telephone and other ut ility costs, travel expenses if your work requires traveling, office equipment like computers, business insurance and licensing fees, and professional membership fees, taxes, and marketing and advertising costs.In addition, you should make sure that your rates allow you to earn enough to cover your living expenses.How Much The Client Is Willing To Pay I mentioned earlier that the best approach is to charge different rates to different clients. For you to do this, you have to be able to evaluate how much the client is expecting to pay for a service.Let’s consider a situation where you have two clients with similar projects.However, there is a difference between the two clients. One client is the proprietor of startup. This client funded the startup from his own pocket, and therefore does not have a huge budget to play with. His budget for the project is $4,000 $5,000. After discussing the project with the client, you realize that you can do it profitably for $5,000.The other clien t is the executive of a huge multinational company with deep pockets. Their budget for the project is $10,000 $15,000. Since the two projects are similar, should you charge both of them $5,000?Charging the multinational the same figure you charged the startup can be bad for your business, and here is why.The executive from the multinational did not just wake up and randomly pick the $10,000 $15,000 budget. They probably did some research about the project and concluded that the kind of service they require is within that price range.Such clients know the kind of work they want and they have no problem forking out a large sum of money to get it. By giving them a quote that is way below their budget, you might be unwittingly sending the message that your work is not worth what they have in mind.The multinational might pass you over, not because you are not qualified, but because they don’t want to take their chances on a cheap freelancer who might end up delivering subpar work.A g ood way to find what the client is willing to pay is to simply ask them if they have a budget for the project. This provides you with a rough idea of what the client might be willing to pay for your services.However, some clients will not be so willing to disclose their budget.Another way of estimating what a client might be willing to pay is to find out as much as you can about the client. What kind of organization does he or she represent? Is it a startup, a non-profit, or a larger organization?Visit their website and do some research about the organization.In most cases, I find that the larger the organization, the more likely they are to be willing to part with a higher amount.Finally, you should also consider the type of work the client requires. The bigger and more demanding a client’s project is, the higher the fee you should demand for it.What Value Are You Providing To The Client?It does not make much sense to charge a client $100 for a service that will help them make or save $10,000, does it? To make sure you are getting the most out of your work, you should consider its value to the client. What does the client stand to gain from your work?Value is directly tied to a problem.What problem is the client trying to solve using your service?To use value as a factor in your pricing, it is good to try and gain as much information as possible about the client’s problem. Is the client trying to make or save money? If so, how much will they make or serve once you provide your service?You should keep in mind that value differs from client to client, which further justifies why you need to adjust your rates depending on the client and their project.Let’s go back to our earlier example to see how this works. Let’s assume that the project that both of them wanted was a website where they could showcase their products and respond to customer enquiries.The first client, being a startup, might be trying to get their first few clients. They figure that with a website, they might increase their revenue by $15,000 $20,000. In this case, charging them $5,000 is sensible because they know they will recoup their money. This client would not be willing to pay $10,000 for the website, since the ROI on the website would not be much.On the other hand, the multinational company might have realized that they are losing over $100,000 in potential sales because they don’t have a website. Therefore, this client will have no problem forking out $15,000 for the website because it will bring in a lot more value for them.The more you can emphasize the value of your service to the client, the higher your earning potential.Your ExperienceAnother thing you need to consider when setting your freelance rates is your expertise and experience. As a freelancer, clients might not have the same confidence in you as they might have in companies or agencies.Clients do not know what you can do and might consider working with you as a gamble. Therefore, if you are just starting out, you might need to charge lower for your services as you build a portfolio and find your first few clients.However, once you have built a persuasive portfolio and increased your expertise, you can charge higher fees. With a portfolio, you give clients the confidence that you will actually deliver since they can already see examples of your work.You should also keep in mind that, as a freelancer, you are selling your specialized skills and knowledge. It therefore makes sense for you to charge higher rates as you continue improving your skills and expertise.Don’t Use Price As A Marketing StrategyOne of the biggest mistakes I have seen freelancers make when deciding what to charge for their work is using price as a marketing strategy. They assume that clients go for the cheapest freelancers, and they therefore price their services competitively thinking that they will attract more clients.Spoiler alert!This strategy does not work.Using low prices as your key strate gy for attracting clients is ineffective because there will always be someone charging less than you. Freelancers who follow this route find themselves in a quick race to the bottom.With this strategy, you won’t earn enough to sustain yourself, and you will end up slaving all the time to make ends up, taking you further away from the freedom you were seeking by becoming a freelancer.In addition, clients know that they get what they pay for. Good clients avoid cheap freelancers because they know the quality of work will be cheap as well. This is why freelancers who try to compete based on price end up with the worst clients who are trying to get the most for least.The best clients who value your work are not primarily looking for a good deal. They are looking for a competent freelancer who will do what they want and do it well. They have no problem paying high prices to get the quality of work they want.By pricing yourself too low, you are basically signaling to these clients that you are not a high quality freelancer.Look at it this way, if you went to buy an iPhone X and found one going for $250, would you buy it?At that price, you would assume it’s a knock off and leave it. The same counts for your work. This does not mean that you should charge an insanely high figure for your services either. Your freelance rate should not be about how much money you can get from the client.It should be about how much value you can offer your clients. The quality of your work should be able to justify whatever amount you decide to charge for your services.WRAPPING UPThere are no hard and fast rules about how to figure out exactly what to charge for your freelance work. The best approach is to have flexible rates depending on your client and their project.There is nothing wrong with charging different rates to different clients.However, before you answer the question “how much do you charge for your services?” make sure that you have considered all the factors discu ssed above.Finally, you should not be afraid to experiment a bit until you figure out a price point that works best for you and your clients.